Zambia to Sign $1.5bn US Health Deal Without Data Clauses

Zambia says it is ready to sign a five-year health agreement with the United States worth USD 1.5 billion in US funding, after controversial clauses on sharing patient data and biological specimens were removed from the draft. The deal, announced by Health Minister Roma Chilengi on 6 October 2026, is part of Washington’s new bilateral approach to health assistance in Africa and could shape how HIV, tuberculosis and malaria programmes in the country are funded and run for years to come.

What has been agreed

According to the Associated Press, the plan is worth a combined USD 3.6 billion over five years, with the United States contributing USD 1.5 billion and the balance coming from Zambia. The Lusaka Times reported that US funding is set to decrease each year over the life of the agreement, and bne IntelliNews reported that signing was expected on 8 October, with the agreement focused on HIV, tuberculosis and malaria.

The key change concerns data and specimens. Speaking to state broadcaster ZNBC, as reported by AP, Mr Chilengi said that “Zambia will not be obliged to share any specimen” and that provisions requiring the sharing of individual health data had been “completely removed”. The Lusaka Times quoted him as saying that the original draft had been “broadly unpopular because it had clauses that were uncomfortable”, adding: “As we speak now we are completely aligned.”

The Lusaka Times also reported calls from opposition politician Antonio Mwanza for the final text to be published before it is signed.

The wider context: a new model for US health aid

The agreement follows the dismantling of USAID and forms part of the US administration’s “America First” approach to health assistance, which replaces much of the previous programme-based model with bilateral government-to-government compacts. AP reported that the United States has signed similar deals with around two dozen African countries since last year.

Not all governments have accepted the terms. AP reported that Zimbabwe rejected comparable provisions in February, with government spokesperson Nick Mangwana arguing that the country would “provide the raw materials for scientific discovery without any assurance that the end products would be accessible to our people”. According to AP, Namibia and Ghana also resisted similar data-sharing requirements, and the United States has been phasing out HIV treatment funding and other health assistance to those countries. The Lusaka Times put the value of Ghana’s rejected compact at USD 109 million and Zimbabwe’s halted deal at USD 350 million.

The debate reflects a broader question facing many African health ministries: how to secure external financing while protecting data sovereignty and national control over health research. Zambia’s negotiated outcome may be watched closely by other governments still in talks.

What it means for the sector and communities

For people living with HIV and others relying on public health services, the most immediate question is continuity: whether treatment, testing and prevention services are maintained as funding arrangements change. A model in which US support declines year on year, while the government’s own contribution rises, implies a gradual transfer of financial and operational responsibility to the Ministry of Health.

For NGOs and implementing partners, this shift matters. Under the previous system, a large share of US health funding flowed through international and local NGOs. Government-to-government agreements are likely to place more emphasis on public sector delivery, health systems strengthening and accountability to national authorities. Organisations that have relied on US grants may need to reposition as technical partners to government, diversify their funding, or focus on community-level services that complement the public system.

What this means for NGO job seekers

Changes in how health aid is delivered tend to shift demand towards particular skill sets rather than eliminate it. If you work, or want to work, in health programming in Zambia or the wider region, roles worth watching include:

  • Health systems strengthening and health financing specialists
  • Technical advisers embedded with ministries of health, particularly in HIV, TB and malaria
  • Health information systems, data protection and data governance specialists
  • Supply chain and pharmaceutical management officers
  • Community health and civil society engagement officers
  • Grants, compliance and transition planning staff helping organisations adapt to new funding models

Practical advice: emphasise experience of working alongside government counterparts, capacity strengthening and transition or sustainability planning. Familiarity with national health strategies and data protection principles is increasingly relevant, given how central data governance has become in these negotiations. Professionals in roles tied to US-funded projects should keep their CVs current and look at opportunities with multilateral agencies, foundations and government-led programmes.

Browse vacancies on our NGO jobs in Zambia page, explore the full jobs board, or look across the region with NGO jobs by country. For tips on positioning your experience, visit our career resources.

Sources